Category Archives: comics

MM Joins the Foreign Legion 2

Echoing Frank’s system, I’ll save commentary for after the strips to prevent spoilers. As the strips originally appeared from April 27th to June 6th, 1936.

Mickey shows off some real acting skills here never seen in the films. In a bit of self-parody, he plays a naive, “goshing” hick to get in Trigger’s good books and trail him without sacrificing his position. Gottfredson also portrays Mickey as a great observer of human behavior, almost echoing the great detective flicks that filled many a matinee in this era. As previously stated, the Gottfredson mouse delivered just about everything the screen mouse did not.

As Mickey’s adventure continues, he is reacquainted with the most colorful of all Disney villains, Peg-Leg Pete. Though usually more fleshed-out as a character than the ones he oppresses onscreen, the animated Pete’s nasty charm was primarily carried by the brilliant performance of Billy Bletcher. Remembered for bullying Mickey onscreen, the thuggish cat was at his best terrorizing Donald in notable shorts like Timber, Trombone Trouble, and The New Neighbor.

Pete in this story does not fit the typical weenie/Disney villain criteria. He is not merely a domineering bully, but a true sadist. Make no mistake of the undertones in the lengthy section where Pete subjects Mickey to torturous ‘duties’. While it is a diabolically delicious way to get Mickey off of his and Trigger’s trails, this is payback for all of the previous cat-and-mouse battles they’ve had previously. The bodily harm (fairly graphically depicted in the art) is simply not enough for this monster. Pete knows that Mickey is aware of what he’s doing, and takes savage pleasure in seeing Mickey refusing to jeopardize his mission in any way, bearing the shame the whole time.

Before it folded, Gemstone Publishing printed a slightly altered version of the May 7th strip, where the African cops are redrawn as dogs (probably by Daan Jippes, the only person alive who can draw in the style of any Disney cartoonist perfectly, not to mention having an amazing style all his own). Probably the biggest bone of contentions with printing the Gottfredson dailies are these antiquated racial caricatures, littered here and there throughout the strip’s history. While the stereotypes are merely incidental here, certain other stories, notably In Search of Jungle Treasure and The Plumber’s Helper, go far beyond the typical ‘darkie’ types and give us an unfortunate insight into Gottfredson’s prejudices. This is not to play a game of pointing fingers or put Gottfredson down in anyway, but it is an unavoidable issue when studying the richest portions of the man’s oeuvre.

——————————————————————————————————————————

Relevant to the discussion of Disney storytelling, I see that my colleague David Gerstein, inbetween telling Scrooge McDuck what to do in Norwegian and sending whiny texts to Tom S. and I about the crying babies on the plane with him, has had another back-and-forth over the use of written prose during the Disney studio’s golden age. If you can read the whole thing, David is, naturally, right and amazingly patient in his dialog with a blatant fraud, supporting his protection of history with his many months of painstaking research. When you are done reading, don’t forget to click the PayPal button on the right and deposit some funds to support my own archive/porn bill. See youse.

12 Comments

Filed under classic animation, comics

MM Joins the Foreign Legion 1

In trying to get a buzz going about him again, I’ll be posting my favorite of all the Mickey Mouse serials by Floyd Gottfredson, Mickey Mouse Joins the Foreign Legion.

By and large, handsome and charming drawing/movement was about all the animated Mickey Mouse had in its favor. Animation by masters Fred Moore, Bill Tytla, Les Clark, and Ken Muse of the character will always remain useful in analyzing bygone principles of the art form. But the character itself never had much in the way of personality. The early black-and-white shorts borrow from Otto Messmer’s mischievous Felix, with none of the imagination; the color Mickey regressed into a framing device for funnier and more interesting characters. This is why the mouse is, really, a bit of a failure as a star of animated comedy shorts. Mickey Mouse just isn’t funny.

This is the problem Floyd Gottfredson had to get around when handling Mickey on a day-to-day basis: how to make this rodent interesting. The decision to make the strip a serio-comedy strip like Segar’s Popeye was one that allowed this major retooling of the character to happen. Gottfredson used the charm of the character as basic groundwork, mixing in senses of bravery, loyalty, and resourcefulness that the animated mouse never had. Whereas the movie mouse had fake charisma that audiences to this day still eat up, the printed mouse’s was genuine.

Walt Disney himself helped Gottfredson put these seeds in place in the important 1930 Death Valley story (along with introducing lawyer character Sylvester Shyster the Crooked Jew, a creation of Walt’s own hand), but the strip would degenerate into gag stories soon enough. 1932 was the year Gottfredson came into his own with the epic MM Sails for Treasure Island and Blaggard Castle, combining a righteous helping each of drama, pathos, and humor to make the Mickey Mouse daily strip a milestone in comic history.

At the time of this strip, 1936, Gottfredson was at his zenith as a storyteller and artist, and had not only developed Mickey into a formidable hybrid of Andy Hardy and Errol Flynn, but also accomplished the unthinkable: he made Minnie interesting too. No longer was she just a framing device, but a strong woman who stands by her man and can take the dangers that come with it (unlike the overbearing bitch Daisy Duck was in Carl Barks’s world). Unfortunately, Foreign Legion is not the best example of this, though I would recommend seeking out 1934’s Captive Castaways, or 1938’s Monarch of Medioka, both of which showcase the rarity of feminine funny animal ingenuity.

Here is the first installment of the story, as it appeared in newspapers from March 23rd to April 25th, 1936. Inking by Ted Thwaites, and scripting by Ted Osborne.

12 Comments

Filed under classic animation, comics, floyd gottfredson

Squabbit Season

Let me heartily recommend the Toon Treasury of Classic Children’s Comics, assembled by Art Spielgelman and Francoise Mouly (and a team of experts that included Mike Barrier, Frank Young, Kim Deitch, and Jeff Smith). This is an excellent sampler of all the masters of the funny animal and people books of the Golden Age of comics. Carl Barks, John Stanley, and Walt Kelly all get nice coverage, as do Sheldon Mayer, Jim Davis, Basil Wolverton (some obscenely early stuff by him!), Milt Gross, and Harvey Kurtzman. While this does the job of allowing one to decide which artists and series he or she would like to pursue further, I fear that its intention of introducing these stories to today’s children is going to probably fail miserably. Animation and comic books are similar, because to an extent, both, as artforms, are dead. Unlike with animation however, which they can see anywhere for free, kids now go for years without actually buying or reading a comic book. The likelihood of them picking up one that isn’t a meandering written and drawn superhero/’serious’ comic (aimed at the most unimaginative of readers) is pretty low. So it’s unlikely that the under 10 crowd will even glance at this amazing tome.

Now, with that typical blunt truthfulness out of the way, I only have two caveats with this book… 1) I’d have chosen a better story than “Bee Bumbles” (WDC&S 158, November 1953), an average story from Barks’s best period. (Perhaps one of the more sublime entries with Gladstone Gander or Gyro Gearloose, such as that classic “Terrible Secret” story from WDC&S 140.) The other two that they chose, however, were fine. 2) The Fox and Crow story they chose was a weak one. There were many, many better examples to choose from, particularly that insane crossover story from Real Screen Comics #100. For shame!

I’d have also included one of the better Li’l Bad Wolf stories by either Carl Buettner or Gil Turner. (And for that matter, at least one of Owen Fitzgerald’s Bob Hope or Martin & Lewis stories.) While a lot of these delve into meandering repetition (ala Famous Studios at its worst), these two really developed the cast into fun and interesting characters. This one written and drawn by Buettner, from WDC&S 57 (June 1945), is one of my favorites. It shows what a disgusting and greedy hick Zeke is at his best, forcing his naive son to do his bidding of torturing the local critters, because he’s too lazy to do so himself. No (non-Billy Wilder) Fred MacMurray this dad be, says I. I also love how morbid the harvesting of the squabbit is. Does Li’l Bad Wolf bring it home dead? Or are we to assume it is being roasted and eaten alive? And why does Buettner draw Practical Pig scowling in every panel? So many unanswered questions these ancient funnybooks pose.

16 Comments

Filed under comics

The Putty Story

WDCS48-coverThere’s some great conversation about Carl Barks going on over at Michael Barrier’s site. In short, while many (myself included) are trying to find other examples of characters that have consistency in spite of a lack of it, like Barks’s Donald, the answer seems to be there really is none. Perhaps that’s what makes Barks’s genius so unique, because one can’t really find parallels between his and other authors’ worlds.

The following is not my favorite Barks story. It probably wouldn’t even be in my Top 20. But it was definitely one of the first ones I ever read closely (in a Gladstone reprint I received in a trade with Rodney Bowcock), after hearing so much about Barks, and when I was of the mindset of: “OK nobody can be that good.” (I had a similar view of Hitchcock in my mid-teens.) But as I quickly found out, he really does deserve the near-canonization he’s received. I’m surprised that I have never read an overall negative critique about Barks, at least from someone sane. Maybe levelheaded people are afraid of that canonization status, and refrain from criticizing Barks (I know I’m afraid of criticizing Charles Schulz because of him being a patron saint in America), but I’d love to read any, just for a different point of view.

This September 1944 story (from Walt Disney’s Comics & Stories #48) is still early enough in Barks’s oeuvre to show some of the “bugs” that plagued it (a little cruder drawing, too much of the brashness of the animated Donald) while at the same time showing how quickly Barks evolved as an artist and writer (stronger sense of composition and dialog). Browsing through these original 1940s issues, I’m stupefied at how literally none of Barks’s colleagues took it upon themselves to improve their work and follow his example.

(I wonder if it was intentional that the forms Donald and Jones take at the end of this story resemble Al Capp’s Hairless Joe and Lonesome Polecat.)

21 Comments

Filed under comics